digital currencies and the future of the monetary system snippets

The logic of profiteering is less but better.Even if there is still some money, which one do you add in the face of so many positions? If you are really given a chance to increase your position by a big drop, you can't achieve the purpose of spreading the cost at all with what little money you have left. Don't say it doesn't make sense to reduce the cost of the whole account, even for the stock you added, it doesn't help much.If it seems that there are not so many things you like, only one or two, then just hold these two and never settle for it. Especially when you are particularly optimistic and particularly sure, you can hold these two in a heavy position.

For this great goal, keep fighting.Don't feel good when picking stocks. After buying a bunch of stocks, the position of each stock is just a scratch. Even if you see it right, you can't make a lot of money if it rises sharply.Some people will ask, how much is less? Personally, if your capital does not exceed 1 million and you hold up to 5 or 6 stocks at the same time, that's enough. Even if you average the score, each stock will have nearly 200,000 funds, and 20% of the positions will be enough, regardless of the profit value of a single stock or the contribution to the portfolio.

If you buy everything, even if you don't buy a lot of shares, it will cost a lot of money together. The downside is that when the market plummeted, the funds you could have gradually increased your positions are now taken up and gone.Think about it, at that time, you can get rid of the same workplace as cattle and horses, and get rid of the infinite complexity of life. You don't have to bow to anyone, you don't have to smile, and you can travel around the world and do anything you want with a mobile phone.